What kind of monster is represented as an aberration of nature, often like King Kong?

The correct choice reflects the idea of a creature or entity that deviates from the norm of nature, exemplified by the character of King Kong. This "natural monster" concept encompasses beings such as King Kong that emerge from, or are influenced by, their natural surroundings yet become distorted due to various factors, like human interference or the clash between civilization and nature. King Kong, towering over everything and embodying both power and a tragic isolation, serves as a representation of the dangers of unchecked evolution and the impact of humanity on the natural order.

In contrast to this choice, the other classifications have distinct connotations. The "Darwinian monster" typically refers to creatures that embody the principles of evolution, survival of the fittest, and the harsh realities of natural selection. The "Freudian monster" points to entities that symbolize psychological horror or internal struggles, often reflecting the darker aspects of the human psyche. The "Old Testament monster" connotes biblical figures and their moral implications, often representing divine retribution or punishment. Each of these classifications has its unique thematic focus, while "natural monster" directly aligns with the aberrations of nature exemplified by King Kong.